[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190312170404.830569776@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:08:55 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Mark Syms <mark.syms@...rix.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 17/25] gfs2: Fix missed wakeups in find_insert_glock
5.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
commit 605b0487f0bc1ae9963bf52ece0f5c8055186f81 upstream.
Mark Syms has reported seeing tasks that are stuck waiting in
find_insert_glock. It turns out that struct lm_lockname contains four padding
bytes on 64-bit architectures that function glock_waitqueue doesn't skip when
hashing the glock name. As a result, we can end up waking up the wrong
waitqueue, and the waiting tasks may be stuck forever.
Fix that by using ht_parms.key_len instead of sizeof(struct lm_lockname) for
the key length.
Reported-by: Mark Syms <mark.syms@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/gfs2/glock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int glock_wake_function(wait_queu
static wait_queue_head_t *glock_waitqueue(struct lm_lockname *name)
{
- u32 hash = jhash2((u32 *)name, sizeof(*name) / 4, 0);
+ u32 hash = jhash2((u32 *)name, ht_parms.key_len / 4, 0);
return glock_wait_table + hash_32(hash, GLOCK_WAIT_TABLE_BITS);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists