[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+rV+yR1xUrpXmGsXuPCwZ2w_D69p-u5L9E0e3mJi7zaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:50:20 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
david.emett@...adcom.com, thomas.spurden@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm: Add helpers for locking an array of BO reservations.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:37 PM Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
>
> Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:17 AM Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Now that we have the reservation object in the GEM object, it's easy
> >> to provide a helper for this common case. Noticed while reviewing
> >> panfrost and lima drivers. This particular version came out of v3d,
> >> which in turn was a copy from vc4.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/drm/drm_gem.h | 4 +++
> >> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
> >
> > Sweet! I was about to go write this same patch. You are changing the
> > license from GPL to MIT copying the v3d version, but I guess you have
> > rights to do that.
> >
> > FWIW,
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> Was this just for this one patch, or the series? I don't think I can
> merge without a consumer.
Sure, it can be for patches 1-3. Patch 4 is dependent on me sending
out the shmem helpers again.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists