linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] mm: introduce put_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01000169705aecf0-76f2b83d-ac18-4872-9421-b4b6efe19fc7-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:23:21 +0000
From:   Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
cc:     john.hubbard@...il.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder
 versions

On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Dave Chinner wrote:

> > Direct IO on a mmapped file backed page doesnt make any sense.
>
> People have used it for many, many years as zero-copy data movement
> pattern. i.e. mmap the destination file, use direct IO to DMA direct
> into the destination file page cache pages, fdatasync() to force
> writeback of the destination file.

Well we could make that more safe through a special API that designates a
range of pages in a file in the same way as for RDMA. This is inherently
not reliable as we found out.

> Now we have copy_file_range() to optimise this sort of data
> movement, the need for games with mmap+direct IO largely goes away.
> However, we still can't just remove that functionality as it will
> break lots of random userspace stuff...

It is already broken and unreliable. Are there really "lots" of these
things around? Can we test this by adding a warning in the kernel and see
where it actually crops up?