linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/1] PM / Domains: Avoid a potential deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190312065128.24994-1-jiada_wang@mentor.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:51:28 +0900
From:   Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
To:     <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <khilman@...nel.org>,
        <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <len.brown@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] PM / Domains: Avoid a potential deadlock

Lockdep warns that prepare_lock and genpd->mlock can cause a deadlock
the deadlock scenario is like following:
First thread is probing cs2000
cs2000_probe()
  clk_register()
    __clk_core_init()
      clk_prepare_lock()                            ----> acquires prepare_lock
        cs2000_recalc_rate()
          i2c_smbus_read_byte_data()
            rcar_i2c_master_xfer()
              dma_request_chan()
                rcar_dmac_of_xlate()
                  rcar_dmac_alloc_chan_resources()
                    pm_runtime_get_sync()
                      __pm_runtime_resume()
                        rpm_resume()
                          rpm_callback()
                            genpd_runtime_resume()   ----> acquires genpd->mlock

Second thread is attaching any device to the same PM domain
genpd_add_device()
  genpd_lock()                                       ----> acquires genpd->mlock
    cpg_mssr_attach_dev()
      of_clk_get_from_provider()
        __of_clk_get_from_provider()
          __clk_create_clk()
            clk_prepare_lock()                       ----> acquires prepare_lock

Since currently no PM provider access genpd's critical section
in .attach_dev, and .detach_dev callbacks, so there is no need to protect
these two callbacks with genpd->mlock.
This patch avoids a potential deadlock by moving out .attach_dev and .detach_dev
from genpd->mlock, so that genpd->mlock won't be held when prepare_lock is acquired
in .attach_dev and .detach_dev

Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/domain.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index 500de1dee967..a00ca6b8117b 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -1467,12 +1467,12 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
 	if (IS_ERR(gpd_data))
 		return PTR_ERR(gpd_data);
 
-	genpd_lock(genpd);
-
 	ret = genpd->attach_dev ? genpd->attach_dev(genpd, dev) : 0;
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
+	genpd_lock(genpd);
+
 	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, &genpd->domain);
 
 	genpd->device_count++;
@@ -1480,9 +1480,8 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
 
 	list_add_tail(&gpd_data->base.list_node, &genpd->dev_list);
 
- out:
 	genpd_unlock(genpd);
-
+ out:
 	if (ret)
 		genpd_free_dev_data(dev, gpd_data);
 	else
@@ -1531,15 +1530,15 @@ static int genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
 	genpd->device_count--;
 	genpd->max_off_time_changed = true;
 
-	if (genpd->detach_dev)
-		genpd->detach_dev(genpd, dev);
-
 	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, NULL);
 
 	list_del_init(&pdd->list_node);
 
 	genpd_unlock(genpd);
 
+	if (genpd->detach_dev)
+		genpd->detach_dev(genpd, dev);
+
 	genpd_free_dev_data(dev, gpd_data);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.19.2