linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Enable the ldisc for ROME for x86 platforms.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1042d21dde881e886541d32b8f0dff63@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:01:59 +0800
From:   rjliao@...eaurora.org
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
        marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        hemantg@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Enable the ldisc for ROME for x86
 platforms.

在 2019-03-09 02:52，Matthias Kaehlcke 写道：
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:43:14AM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>> 
>> On 2019-03-08 02:12, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > Hi Balakrishna,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 03:47:22PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
>> > > When using btattach to setup Rome over ldisc we observed a crash
>> > > in qca_setup as it will try to access the serdev which is not
>> > > available in the ldisc proto. This patch will fix the crash by
>> > > support both the ldisc and serdev way in the qca hci_uart driver.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>
>> >
>> > Oh, I wasn't aware of the instantiation through ldisc and was actually
>> > considering to *remove* some of the seemingly unnecessary serdev
>> > checks.
>> >
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 47
>> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> > > index 237aea34b69f..0a5c98d46864 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> > > @@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int qca_set_baudrate(struct hci_dev
>> > > *hdev, uint8_t baudrate)
>> > >  {
>> > >  	struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>> > >  	struct qca_data *qca = hu->priv;
>> > > -	struct qca_serdev *qcadev;
>> > > +	struct qca_serdev *qcadev = NULL;
>> >
>> > In many cases the only field that is accessed is qcadev->btsoc_type. I
>> > think something like 'qca_get_soc_type(struct hci_dev *hdev / struct
>> > hci_uart *hu)' would make things more readable.
>> >
>> [Bala]: sure will update this in other patch once this change is 
>> landed as
>> this has to
>>         go in priority as we have crash coming.
> 
> That's not how things should work, especially for fairly trivial
> changes. It requires reviewers to first spent time to review the patch
> that adds clutter and later spend more time to review the one that
> removes it. It's also easier to get a clean patch merged in the first
> place, rather than a noisy one.
> 
> Anyway, here is my take at it: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1049014/
> 
> Please help with testing for ROME, unless you disagree with the
> approach.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Matthias

Hi Matthias,

I will test your patch and update to you, and you are correct that 
AR3002 is not part of Rome family, you should use QCA_ROME as the 
default return of qca_soc_type. Could you also loop me in 
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1049014/?

Thanks,
Rocky