[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025500.4so6M6JK9C@phil>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:38:36 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com,
Akash Gajjar <akash@...nedev.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: rock960: Rename vcc_sys into vcc5v0_sys
Am Montag, 11. März 2019, 16:03:30 CET schrieb Jagan Teki:
> It is always better practice to follow regulator naming conventions
> as per the schematics for future references.
>
> So, rename vcc_sys into vcc5v0_sys as per rk3399 power diagram of
> rock960 schematics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> Signed-off-by: Akash Gajjar <akash@...nedev.com>
I've double-checked both rock960 and ficus schematics to verify
and applied both patch 1+2 for 5.2
Thanks
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists