lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190312170355.979726792@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:08:14 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 076/149] bpf: sock recvbuff must be limited by rmem_max in bpf_setsockopt()

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit c9e4576743eeda8d24dedc164d65b78877f9a98c ]

When sock recvbuff is set by bpf_setsockopt(), the value must by
limited by rmem_max. It is the same with sendbuff.

Fixes: 8c4b4c7e9ff0 ("bpf: Add setsockopt helper function to bpf")
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Acked-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/core/filter.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index fb0080e84bd4..bed9061102f4 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -3909,10 +3909,12 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_setsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
 		/* Only some socketops are supported */
 		switch (optname) {
 		case SO_RCVBUF:
+			val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_rmem_max);
 			sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
 			sk->sk_rcvbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF);
 			break;
 		case SO_SNDBUF:
+			val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_wmem_max);
 			sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
 			sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
 			break;
-- 
2.19.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ