linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: dt: Add support for interconnect bandwidth scaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190313090010.20534-5-georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:00:10 +0200
From:   Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To:     vireshk@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, nm@...com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc:     jcrouse@...eaurora.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
        seansw@....qualcomm.com, daidavid1@...eaurora.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, sibis@...eaurora.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        georgi.djakov@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: dt: Add support for interconnect bandwidth scaling

In addition to clocks and regulators, some devices can scale the bandwidth
of their on-chip interconnect - for example between CPU and DDR memory. Add
support for that, so that platforms which support it can make use of it.

Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index e58bfcb1169e..30fed0fc266d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
@@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ static int resources_available(void)
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
 	struct regulator *cpu_reg;
 	struct clk *cpu_clk;
+	struct icc_path *cpu_path;
 	int ret = 0;
 	const char *name;
 
@@ -126,6 +128,19 @@ static int resources_available(void)
 
 	clk_put(cpu_clk);
 
+	cpu_path = of_icc_get(cpu_dev, NULL);
+	ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(cpu_path);
+	if (ret) {
+		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "defer icc path: %d\n", ret);
+		else
+			dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get icc path: %d\n", ret);
+
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	icc_put(cpu_path);
+
 	name = find_supply_name(cpu_dev);
 	/* Platform doesn't require regulator */
 	if (!name)
@@ -205,10 +220,18 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		}
 	}
 
+	opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_path(cpu_dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
+		dev_err(cpu_dev, "Failed to set interconnect path for cpu%d: %d\n",
+			policy->cpu, ret);
+		goto out_put_regulator;
+	}
+
 	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!priv) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_put_regulator;
+		goto out_put_path;
 	}
 
 	priv->reg_name = name;
@@ -288,6 +311,8 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	if (priv->have_static_opps)
 		dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(policy->cpus);
 	kfree(priv);
+out_put_path:
+	dev_pm_opp_put_path(opp_table);
 out_put_regulator:
 	if (name)
 		dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);