linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:14:29 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:44:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release.
> > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Early results:
> 
> Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
> Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
>   PERF_VERSION = 4.9.162.g605129
> builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’:
> builtin-trace.c:2071:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strstarts’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> builtin-trace.c:2071:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘strstarts’ [-Werror=nested-externs]
> 
> Also affects v4.4.y-queue.

Hm, at first I was worried about my backport, but if it hit 4.4 as well,
that's not my fault :)

I'll look at this after breakfast, thanks!

greg k-h