[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bd04037-698f-00c7-aa91-2bfec751bb0e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:25:38 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mmap: handle worst-case heap randomization in
mmap_base
On 3/12/19 10:32 AM, Ali Saidi wrote:
> + /* Provide space for brk randomization */
> + pad += SZ_32M;
Just curious: Why is the padding in your other patch conditional on the
32-bit vs. 64-bit apps, but here it's always 32M?
Also, did you hit this problem in practice somehow?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists