[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f90d4497-a174-352b-6f1e-0b8de19088ec@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:26:46 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: lp87565: Fix missing register for
LP87565_BUCK_0
On 01/03/19 11:46 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
> LP87565_BUCK_0 is missed, fix it.
>
> Fixes: f0168a9bf ("regulator: lp87565: Add support for lp87565 PMIC regulators")
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> ---
> Hi J Keerthy,
> While reading the code, it seems strange that LP87565_BUCK_0 is never used.
> So current code only register 3 BUCKs for lp87565-regulator.
> Can you confirm if this fix is correct or not?
Axel,
If you look at the if check later:
if (lp87565->dev_type == LP87565_DEVICE_TYPE_LP87565_Q1) {
Currently the device that i am using only uses LP87565_BUCK_10 and
LP87565_BUCK_23(dual phase).
So your patch definitely makes sense when all 4 are used individually.
Thanks for catching this.
Reviewed-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>
> Thanks,
> Axel
> drivers/regulator/lp87565-regulator.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/lp87565-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/lp87565-regulator.c
> index 4ed41731a5b1..0418e478c6dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/lp87565-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/lp87565-regulator.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int lp87565_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct lp87565 *lp87565 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> struct regulator_config config = { };
> struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> - int i, min_idx = LP87565_BUCK_1, max_idx = LP87565_BUCK_3;
> + int i, min_idx = LP87565_BUCK_0, max_idx = LP87565_BUCK_3;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lp87565);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists