linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: allow to forbid unprivileged users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:01:40 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@...s.org>,
        Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@...tuozzo.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
        Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: allow to forbid unprivileged users

On 3/13/19 11:52 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> 
> hugetlbfs is more complicated to detect, because even if you inherit
> it from fork(), the services that mounts the fs may be in a different
> container than the one that Oracle that uses userfaultfd later on down
> the road from a different context. And I don't think it would be ok to
> allow running userfaultfd just because you can open a file in an
> hugetlbfs file system. With /dev/kvm it's a bit different, that's
> chmod o-r by default.. no luser should be able to open it.
> 
> Unless somebody suggests a consistent way to make hugetlbfs "just
> work" (like we could achieve clean with CRIU and KVM), I think Oracle
> will need a one liner change in the Oracle setup to echo into that
> file in addition of running the hugetlbfs mount.

I think you are suggesting the DB setup process enable uffd for all users.
Correct?

This may be too simple, and I don't really like group access, but how about
just defining a uffd group?  If you are in the group you can make uffd
system calls.
-- 
Mike Kravetz