lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:39:10 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
        Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:     linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: annotate implicit fall through

Mathieu,

On 3/13/19 3:28 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> ping ?
> 

I have sent the following patch to address all these warnings in
firewire:

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1040737/

and, as this is being ignored, I'll add it to my tree for 5.2.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:42 PM Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org> wrote:
>>
>> There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
>> this place in the code produced a warning (W=1).
>>
>> In this particular case rewrote the comment to start with the string "fall
>> through", so as to match the regular expression expected by GCC.
>>
>> This commit remove the following warning:
>>
>>   drivers/firewire/core-iso.c:308:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/firewire/core-iso.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c b/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c
>> index 35e784cffc23..d2d50bda5a5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c
>> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int manage_channel(struct fw_card *card, int irm_id, int generation,
>>                         if ((data[0] & bit) == (data[1] & bit))
>>                                 continue;
>>
>> -                       /* 1394-1995 IRM, fall through to retry. */
>> +                       /* fall through - 1394-1995 IRM to retry. */
>>                 default:
>>                         if (retry) {
>>                                 retry--;
>> --
>> 2.19.2
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ