[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3UDhJLh9o1A-EEouP58L9H_uZO=e8L0JZsmGToQH0dAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:01:46 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Applied "spi: work around clang bug in SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK()" to
the spi tree
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:15 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > -#define SPI_BIT_MASK(bits) (((bits) == 32) ? ~0U : (BIT(bits) - 1))
> > -#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) (SPI_BIT_MASK(max) - SPI_BIT_MASK(min - 1))
> > +#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) GENMASK((min) - 1, (max) - 1)
>
> This is not correct: GENMASK() order is from msb to lsb.
> So it should it:
>
> +#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) GENMASK((max) - 1, (min) - 1)
Sorry about the mess, I've sent a fixup now.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists