| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 01:01:07 -0600
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib/siphash.c: annotate implicit fall throughs
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks for getting this v3 into shape.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:12 PM Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org> wrote:
> There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
> these places in the code produced warnings (W=1). Fix them up.
>
> This commit remove the following warnings:
>
> lib/siphash.c:71:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:72:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:73:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:75:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:108:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:109:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:110:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:112:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:434:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> lib/siphash.c:462:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>
> Move the break statement onto the next line to match the fall-through
> comment pattern. Also move the trailing statement onto the next line to
> pass checkpatch verification.
>
> Acked-by: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
> ---
> v3: move break statements onto next line and please checkpatch
> v2: some cases were missed in v1, update missing ones
>
> lib/siphash.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/siphash.c b/lib/siphash.c
> index 3ae58b4edad6..f459e0f4a14e 100644
> --- a/lib/siphash.c
> +++ b/lib/siphash.c
> @@ -68,13 +68,26 @@ u64 __siphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key)
> bytemask_from_count(left)));
> #else
> switch (left) {
> - case 7: b |= ((u64)end[6]) << 48;
> - case 6: b |= ((u64)end[5]) << 40;
> - case 5: b |= ((u64)end[4]) << 32;
> - case 4: b |= le32_to_cpup(data); break;
> - case 3: b |= ((u64)end[2]) << 16;
> - case 2: b |= le16_to_cpup(data); break;
> - case 1: b |= end[0];
> + case 7:
> + b |= ((u64)end[6]) << 48;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 6:
> + b |= ((u64)end[5]) << 40;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 5:
> + b |= ((u64)end[4]) << 32;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 4:
> + b |= le32_to_cpup(data);
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + b |= ((u64)end[2]) << 16;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 2:
> + b |= le16_to_cpup(data);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + b |= end[0];
> }
> #endif
> POSTAMBLE
> @@ -101,13 +114,26 @@ u64 __siphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key)
> bytemask_from_count(left)));
> #else
> switch (left) {
> - case 7: b |= ((u64)end[6]) << 48;
> - case 6: b |= ((u64)end[5]) << 40;
> - case 5: b |= ((u64)end[4]) << 32;
> - case 4: b |= get_unaligned_le32(end); break;
> - case 3: b |= ((u64)end[2]) << 16;
> - case 2: b |= get_unaligned_le16(end); break;
> - case 1: b |= end[0];
> + case 7:
> + b |= ((u64)end[6]) << 48;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 6:
> + b |= ((u64)end[5]) << 40;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 5:
> + b |= ((u64)end[4]) << 32;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 4:
> + b |= get_unaligned_le32(end);
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + b |= ((u64)end[2]) << 16;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 2:
> + b |= get_unaligned_le16(end);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + b |= end[0];
> }
> #endif
> POSTAMBLE
> @@ -431,9 +457,14 @@ u32 __hsiphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key)
> v0 ^= m;
> }
> switch (left) {
> - case 3: b |= ((u32)end[2]) << 16;
> - case 2: b |= le16_to_cpup(data); break;
> - case 1: b |= end[0];
> + case 3:
> + b |= ((u32)end[2]) << 16;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 2:
> + b |= le16_to_cpup(data);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + b |= end[0];
> }
> HPOSTAMBLE
> }
> @@ -454,9 +485,14 @@ u32 __hsiphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len,
> v0 ^= m;
> }
> switch (left) {
> - case 3: b |= ((u32)end[2]) << 16;
> - case 2: b |= get_unaligned_le16(end); break;
> - case 1: b |= end[0];
> + case 3:
> + b |= ((u32)end[2]) << 16;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 2:
> + b |= get_unaligned_le16(end);
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + b |= end[0];
> }
> HPOSTAMBLE
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
Reviewed-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Greg - would you take this through your tree?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists