[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190314100358.tpkianohhoxnfsmu@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:33:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/tsc: Update cpufreq transition notifier to
handle multiple CPUs
On 14-03-19, 10:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:43 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > - set_cyc2ns_scale(tsc_khz, freq->cpu, rdtsc());
> > + if (boot_cpu) {
> > + boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy = lpj;
> > + } else {
> > + for_each_cpu(cpu, freq->cpus)
>
> This needs to iterate over policy->cpus or you change the behavior.
>
> Not that it will matter a lot (x86 in one CPU per policy anyway in the
> vast majority of cases), but it is a change nevertheless. Moreover,
> I'm not even sure if doing that for offline CPUs makes sense.
Okay.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists