linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/doc: fix missing verb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190314104316.GS2665@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:43:16 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/doc: fix missing verb

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:35:37PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Add a missing "be". While there, also fix the syntax for
> struct drm_device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>

Queued for 5.2, thanks for your patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  include/drm/drm_drv.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> index 570f9d03b2eb..ecbbcb281260 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> @@ -152,9 +152,9 @@ enum drm_driver_feature {
>  /**
>   * struct drm_driver - DRM driver structure
>   *
> - * This structure represent the common code for a family of cards. There will
> - * one drm_device for each card present in this family. It contains lots of
> - * vfunc entries, and a pile of those probably should be moved to more
> + * This structure represent the common code for a family of cards. There will be
> + * one &struct drm_device for each card present in this family. It contains lots
> + * of vfunc entries, and a pile of those probably should be moved to more
>   * appropriate places like &drm_mode_config_funcs or into a new operations
>   * structure for GEM drivers.
>   */
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch