[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1y35hn298.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:06:59 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: libfc: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
Hi Hannes,
>>> There is a potential NULL pointer dereference in case
>>> fc_rport_create() fails and returns NULL.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
>>> index ff943f4..e2a3551 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
>>> @@ -250,6 +250,10 @@ static void fc_lport_ptp_setup(struct fc_lport *lport,
>>> }
>>> mutex_lock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>>> lport->ptp_rdata = fc_rport_create(lport, remote_fid);
>>> + if (!lport->ptp_rdata) {
>>> + mutex_unlock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> kref_get(&lport->ptp_rdata->kref);
>>> lport->ptp_rdata->ids.port_name = remote_wwpn;
>>> lport->ptp_rdata->ids.node_name = remote_wwnn;
>>>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
A bit confused. You had originally replied that the patch was not
correct so I closed it in patchwork. And now there's a Reviewed-by:
without any explanation as to why you have changed your mind.
Please clarify, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists