[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cd9c42c-1056-979f-568e-c7e387bf90c6@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:19:42 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] leds: netdev trigger: allow setting initial values in
device tree
On 14/03/2019 13.00, Pavel Machek wrote:
linux,default-trigger from
>
> Yeah and now insert the modules for the can devices in different
> order... May not happen in your case but will be fairly common for
> ethernets.
Unpredictable device names is not a problem I'm trying to solve, nor one
that actually occurs on embedded systems. And even if one has such a
system, one is likely running udev or similar to rename devices to
something sane and predictable, in which case a fixed string _still_
works fine. Or one uses udev rules to munge the netdev trigger sysfs
files, and has applications dealing with devices appearing as banana457.
OK, so there's of_find_net_device_by_node, so a phandle solution might
also be possible, and might work just as well for my case. But I still
think initializing with a fixed string is the simplest and sanest thing
to do.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists