[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190314150737.61eed622@endymion>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:07:37 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Armando Miraglia <arma2ff0@...il.com>, neil@...wn.name,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
sankalpnegi2310@...il.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, sr@...x.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: Attempt to address style issues in
spi-mt7621.c
Hi Dan,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:27:32 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:13:15PM +0100, Armando Miraglia wrote:
> > Is there an explicit intent to deprecate Lindent in favor of checkpatch.pl
> > --fix? If one would like to contribute to fixing the tooling for linting which
> > of the two would be the right target for such an effort?
>
> I've added Jean to the CC list because he worked on Lindent a few
> years ago. I really think we should just delete Lindent. I haven't
> used the checkpatch.pl --fix option but Joe Perches has good style.
I merely fixed obvious but minor issues in Lindent as I stumbled upon
them the one time in my life I used that script. That was years ago.
I'm not using it on a regular basis. My principle is that if a script
is present in the kernel tree then it can and should be maintained. If
it is deemed not worth the maintenance effort then it should be
deleted. I don't care either way.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists