linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190314154052.345v74snhtc4cqbe@e110439-lin>
Date:   Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:40:52 +0000
From:   Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets
 refcounting

On 14-Mar 08:29, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:46 AM Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
> > On 13-Mar 14:32, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:06 AM Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:

[...]

> > > > The rq::uclamp::bucket[clamp_id][] array is scanned every time we need
> > > > to find a new MAX aggregated clamp value for a clamp_id. This operation
> > > > is required only when we dequeue the last task of a clamp bucket
> > > > tracking the current MAX aggregated clamp value. In these cases, the CPU
> > > > is either entering IDLE or going to schedule a less boosted or more
> > > > clamped task.

The following:

> > > > The expected number of different clamp values, configured at build time,
> > > > is small enough to fit the full unordered array into a single cache
> > > > line.

will read:

The expected number of different clamp values, configured at build time,
is small enough to fit the full unordered array into a single cache
line for the default UCLAMP_BUCKETS configuration of 7 buckets.

[...]

> Got it. From reading the documentation at the beginning my impression
> was that whatever value I choose within allowed 5-20 range it would
> still fit in a cache line. To disambiguate it might be worse
> mentioning that this is true for the default value or for values up to
> 7. Thanks!

Right, I hope the above proposed change helps to clarify that.

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi