[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190314163501.2f414a78@jacob-builder>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:35:01 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: James Sewart <jamessewart@...sta.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Tom Murphy <tmurphy@...sta.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:59:36 +0000
James Sewart <jamessewart@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> - domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(dev);
> + domain = find_domain(dev);
> if (!domain)
> return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
>
> @@ -3914,7 +3624,7 @@ static int intel_map_sg(struct device *dev,
> struct scatterlist *sglist, int nele if (iommu_no_mapping(dev))
> return intel_nontranslate_map_sg(dev, sglist,
> nelems, dir);
> - domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(dev);
> + domain = find_domain(dev);
This patchset looks like a very good clean up, I am wondering why we
can't use the generic iommu_get_domain_for_dev() here, since VT-d has a
default DMA domain after your patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists