linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: event scheduling cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBT9_ayhH2puPtLiemtM=VOXxNhC4AXrKkOaDMatWifLxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:15:02 -0700
From:   Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tonyj@...e.com,
        nelson.dsouza@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: event scheduling cleanups

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> These here patches are the result of chasing a bug in the TSX Force Abort
> patches.
>
> The first patch is simple and fixes the issue and should be marked /urgent and
> backported.
>
> The rest is the result of having a hard look at how all that event scheduling
> stuff worked while trying to figure out wth was going wrong.
>
> Stephane, since you were involved with writing much of that code, can you
> please have a good look? I _think_ I got it, but... :-)
>
Will do today.
But you did not send me PATCH 1/8 apparently.