linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:21:07 -0700
From:   hpa@...or.com
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        X86 <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        corbet@....net, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com,
        Ross John Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Secure Launch boot protocol

On March 14, 2019 11:53:18 AM PDT, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org> wrote:
>.. snip..
>>
>> Double NAK – I'm in a meeting right now but with clarify shortly.
>
>Would it help if we had a meeting to brainstorm an acceptable solution?
>Thank you.

It would. I'll write up the immediate issues (which are trivial – just some misunderstanding of the boot protocol. I just wanted to make sure it didn't get merged and possibly get set in stone) later tonight, but it would be great to talk about underlying issues.

Do I remember right that you are on the east coast, or am I full of it.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.