linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: Allow to eliminate softirq processing from rcutree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190315135724.anljnrwgouamz2iy@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:57:24 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Allow to eliminate softirq processing from rcutree

On 2019-03-15 09:35:44 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:11:30 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > +static void rcu_cpu_kthread_park(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> 
> Should we add one of the trace_rcu_.. trace events here?

If it is required and I'm told which one it is then sure I can add it.

> -- Steve

Sebastian