lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190315171927.278781126E81@debutante.sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:19:27 +0000 (GMT)
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Get rid of struct pm800_regulators" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: 88pm800: Get rid of struct pm800_regulators

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 6cabb8b7fc1428eb573f426a17a853d81227d095 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:55:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: 88pm800: Get rid of struct pm800_regulators

The struct pm800_regulators only has 2 members: *chip and *map.
The pm800_data->chip is not used. The pm800_data->map is not necessary.
Thus remove the struct pm800_regulators.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/88pm800.c | 18 +-----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
index 89bbd6e8bad1..9fd379732d18 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
@@ -77,11 +77,6 @@ struct pm800_regulator_info {
 	int max_ua;
 };
 
-struct pm800_regulators {
-	struct pm80x_chip *chip;
-	struct regmap *map;
-};
-
 /*
  * vreg - the buck regs string.
  * ereg - the string for the enable register.
@@ -235,7 +230,6 @@ static int pm800_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct pm80x_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
 	struct pm80x_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(pdev->dev.parent);
-	struct pm800_regulators *pm800_data;
 	struct regulator_config config = { };
 	struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
 	int i, ret;
@@ -252,18 +246,8 @@ static int pm800_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	pm800_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pm800_data),
-					GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pm800_data)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	pm800_data->map = chip->subchip->regmap_power;
-	pm800_data->chip = chip;
-
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pm800_data);
-
 	config.dev = chip->dev;
-	config.regmap = pm800_data->map;
+	config.regmap = chip->subchip->regmap_power;
 	for (i = 0; i < PM800_ID_RG_MAX; i++) {
 		struct regulator_dev *regulator;
 
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ