linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5 v2] dma-buf: Add dma-buf heaps framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <786b46cd-d7fe-688f-ce00-24579d36c449@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:49:15 -0500
From:   "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
        Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
        Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
        Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5 v2] dma-buf: Add dma-buf heaps framework

On 3/15/19 3:18 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 3/5/19 12:54 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> +DMA-BUF HEAPS FRAMEWORK
>> +M:    Laura Abbott<labbott@...hat.com>
>> +R:    Liam Mark<lmark@...eaurora.org>
>> +R:    Brian Starkey<Brian.Starkey@....com>
>> +R:    "Andrew F. Davis"<afd@...com>
>> +R:    John Stultz<john.stultz@...aro.org>
>> +S:    Maintained
>> +L:    linux-media@...r.kernel.org
>> +L:    dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> +L:    linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org  (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +F:    include/uapi/linux/dma-heap.h
>> +F:    include/linux/dma-heap.h
>> +F:    drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c
>> +F:    drivers/dma-buf/heaps/*
>> +T:    git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc
> 
> So I talked about this with Sumit privately but I think
> it might make sense to have me step down as maintainer when
> this goes out of staging. I mostly worked on Ion at my
> previous position and anything I do now is mostly a side
> project. I still want to see it succeed which is why I
> took on the maintainer role but I don't want to become blocking
> for people who have a stronger vision about where this needs
> to go (see also, I'm not working with this on a daily basis).
> 
> If you just want someone to help review or take patches
> to be pulled, I'm happy to do so but I'd hate to become
> the bottleneck on getting things done for people who
> are attempting to do real work.
> 

We could consider this as an "ION inspired" framework, and treat it like
an extension of DMA-BUF. In which case Sumit could become the default
Maintainer if he's up for it.

Andrew

> Thanks,
> Laura