[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2a36dc4-fc66-97b9-cadb-ccd37e2b400a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:45:50 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/spelling.txt: add more typos to spelling.txt and
sort
On 2019/3/15 11:07, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> Does it makes sense to list every typo that is simply a transposition of
> characters or a character omitted? This file will become very large very
> quickly if we do that.
We are consistent in one thing: typo hurt eyes.
Those typos are exactly generated from and still existing in the kernel
tree and they're constantly merged out of our carelessness.
> Such errors can be found algorithmically where the correct spelling is
> known. E.g. the file contains 'algorithm' so 'algrthm' can easily be
> obtained programatically.
Nice hint on transposition programmability which means effect to me.
It looks the mistake line could be removed form scripts/spelling.txt
after we add transposition check to scripts/checkpatch.pl. ($0.02)
>
> Suggest you restrict this to common misspellings. That's not a NAK and I'm
> not the relevant maintainer. Just my $0.02.
>
Thanks for your comment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists