[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+Zg4RVbV=ePRYff9BbpqAg0bOUS79Os5kzQXF39z_KSLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 15:57:48 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot? printk?] no WARN_ON() messages printed before "Kernel
panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ..."
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 3:53 PM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> On 2019/03/16 23:16, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >>> Maybe try running with "ignore_loglevel" kernel command line option added?
> >>
> >> Right, that's something I would expect 0-day and syzkaller to do.
> >
> > to double-check: enabling this won't lead to verbose/debug level of logging?
> >
>
> I don't know what "verbose/debug level" means. But enabling this option causes
> KERN_{EMERG,ALERT,CRIT,ERR,WARNING,NOTICE,INFO,DEBUG} be printed equally.
>
> "ignore loglevel setting (prints all kernel messages to the console)"
>
> static bool suppress_message_printing(int level)
> {
> return (level >= console_loglevel && !ignore_loglevel);
> }
Then I don't think it's suitable: there will be too much output.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists