[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190316151912.4a7ea87d@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 15:19:12 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Cc: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@...il.com>, pakki001@....edu,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: hmc: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:19:25 -0500
Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu> wrote:
> > On Mar 9, 2019, at 12:29 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 14:42:09 +0100
> > Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@...il.com <mailto:tduszyns@...il.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 11:15:32PM -0600, Kangjie Lu wrote:
> >>> devm_regmap_init_i2c may fail and return NULL. The fix returns
> >>> the error when it fails.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/iio/magnetometer/hmc5843_i2c.c | 7 ++++++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/hmc5843_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/hmc5843_i2c.c
> >>> index 3de7f4426ac4..c0cd0823f8d5 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/hmc5843_i2c.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/hmc5843_i2c.c
> >>> @@ -58,8 +58,13 @@ static const struct regmap_config hmc5843_i2c_regmap_config = {
> >>> static int hmc5843_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *cli,
> >>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> >>> {
> >>> + struct regmap *devm_regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(cli,
> >>> + &hmc5843_i2c_regmap_config);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(devm_regmap))
> >>> + return PTR_ERR(devm_regmap);
> >>
> >> This fixes only one part of the problem leaving identical spi issue
> >> behind. I guess this check should be part of *common_probe().
> > It could be, but that somewhat hides the error checking.
> >
> > I'd prefer to see it fixed like this, but in both here and the spi
> > file. Both this and spi in one patch would be great!
>
> I’ve submitted the patch for spi as well.
>
Ah. I missed it because of inconsistent patch naming.
Anyhow, there were some minor suggestions for that patch so please
send a v2 with the two combined.
Thanks
Jonathan
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> return hmc5843_common_probe(&cli->dev,
> >>> - devm_regmap_init_i2c(cli, &hmc5843_i2c_regmap_config),
> >>> + devm_regmap,
> >>> id->driver_data, id->name);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists