linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adc: ad7192: Add spaces around minus operator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190316155936.4af7ad9d@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 16 Mar 2019 15:59:36 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>,
        Karen Palacio <karen.palacio.1994@...il.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, lars@...afoo.de,
        "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>, knaack.h@....de,
        Mircea Caprioru <mircea.caprioru@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adc: ad7192: Add spaces around minus
 operator

On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:31:59 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:12:48AM +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:23 PM Karen Palacio
> > <karen.palacio.1994@...il.com> wrote:  
> > >
> > > Add spaces around minus operator to fix readibility.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Karen Palacio <karen.palacio.1994@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> > > index acdbc07..7c632cf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7192.c
> > > @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ ad7192_show_scale_available(struct device *dev,
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED(in_v_m_v_scale_available,
> > > -                            in_voltage-voltage_scale_available,
> > > +                            in_voltage - voltage_scale_available,  
> > 
> > This isn't broken, but I do agree it should be addressed.
> > I think it's the second time I see a similar patch trying to fix this.
> > So, obviously the code is a bit misleading.
> >   
> 
> It's got to be more than that.  I did a simple grep of my inbox and it
> says that this is the 13th time someone has tried to do this.  It's
> possible that my grep is wrong, 13 seems high but not totaly impossible.

That sounds about right.

Best bet is to move this over to the read_avail callback and do it using
the core handling for available attributes which will build the name
in code so checkpatch won't find it.

Anyone want to spin up a patch to do that and save anyone else wasting
time on this?  Or we could just put a comment right next to it and hope
people read it..  

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>