linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/CPU: Use correct Cyrix-specific macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 Mar 2019 12:00:49 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/CPU: Use correct Cyrix-specific macros

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:46 PM Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Replace the incorrect Cyrix-specific macro calls with the correct
> setCx86() and getCx86() calls. Also remove the unused setCx86_old(),
> getCx86_old() and their related comments in the code.
>
> Matthew Whitehead (2):
>   x86/CPU: Use correct macros for Cyrix calls on Geode processors
>   x86/CPU: Remove {get,set}Cx86_old macros used for Cyrix processors

This series looks reasonable to me.  Also, Matthew seems to be the
best tester around for this old hardware, so, if he says it works, I
believe him :)  I certainly can't test this stuff.

--Andy