linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] HMM updates for 5.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gotYtvo7hupYCxYsYCmNHaf8yoYgfi53N3AhuvMmT1zA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:36:56 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] HMM updates for 5.1

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:29 PM Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com> wrote:
[..]
> > I went looking for the hmm_dma_map() patches on the list but could not
> > find them, so I was reacting to the "This new functions just do
> > dma_map", and wondered if that was the full extent of the
> > justification.
>
> They are here [1] patch 7 in this patch serie

Ah, I was missing the _range in my search. I'll take my comments over
to that patch. Thanks.

> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/29/1016