[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155294048956.20095.14072308972262767231@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:21:29 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, airlied@...ux.ie,
daniel@...ll.ch, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
mturquette@...libre.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
robh+dt@...nel.org, xuwei5@...ilicon.com
Cc: john.stultz@...aro.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
yuq825@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] clk: hi6220: use CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER
Quoting Peter Griffin (2019-03-18 12:38:51)
> As now we also need to probe in the reset driver as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi6220.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Doesn't this need to be squashed with the reset driver bits so we don't
have a bisection hole?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi6220.c b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi6220.c
> index a87809d..952ffe2 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi6220.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi6220.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void __init hi6220_clk_ao_init(struct device_node *np)
> hisi_clk_register_gate_sep(hi6220_separated_gate_clks_ao,
> ARRAY_SIZE(hi6220_separated_gate_clks_ao), clk_data_ao);
> }
> -CLK_OF_DECLARE(hi6220_clk_ao, "hisilicon,hi6220-aoctrl", hi6220_clk_ao_init);
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(hi6220_clk_ao, "hisilicon,hi6220-aoctrl", hi6220_clk_ao_init);
Can you also add a comment indicating why/what is the other driver that
is probing the same device node?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists