[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8dff925-3ec4-3a40-f129-ea162ca25aed@st.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:08:57 +0000
From: Mickael GUENE <mickael.guene@...com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
CC: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: Document MIPID02 bindings
Sakari,
>>>> +
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +
>>>> +mipid02: mipid02@14 {
>>>
>>> The node should be a generic name. "csi2rx" is used by a few devices now.
>>>
>> If I understand you well, you would prefer:
>> csi2rx: mipid02@14 {
>> I show no usage of csi2rx node naming except for MIPI-CSI2 RX controller.
>
> The other way around. :)
>
> The label can be more or less anything AFAIK.
>
Ok got it !!! So something like 'mipid02: bridge@14 {' should be ok ?
Thx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists