linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 29/31] mmc: tmio_mmc_core: dont claim spurious interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190318084211.600714459@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:26:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 29/31] mmc: tmio_mmc_core: dont claim spurious interrupts

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>

commit 5c27ff5db1491a947264d6d4e4cbe43ae6535bae upstream.

I have encountered an interrupt storm during the eMMC chip probing (and
the chip finally didn't get detected).  It turned out that U-Boot left
the DMAC interrupts enabled while the Linux driver  didn't use those.
The SDHI driver's interrupt handler somehow assumes that, even if an
SDIO interrupt didn't happen, it should return IRQ_HANDLED.  I think
that if none of the enabled interrupts happened and got handled, we
should return IRQ_NONE -- that way the kernel IRQ code recoginizes
a spurious interrupt and masks it off pretty quickly...

Fixes: 7729c7a232a9 ("mmc: tmio: Provide separate interrupt handlers")
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static bool __tmio_mmc_sdcard_irq(struct
 	return false;
 }
 
-static void tmio_mmc_sdio_irq(int irq, void *devid)
+static bool tmio_mmc_sdio_irq(int irq, void *devid)
 {
 	struct tmio_mmc_host *host = devid;
 	struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static void tmio_mmc_sdio_irq(int irq, v
 	unsigned int sdio_status;
 
 	if (!(pdata->flags & TMIO_MMC_SDIO_IRQ))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	status = sd_ctrl_read16(host, CTL_SDIO_STATUS);
 	ireg = status & TMIO_SDIO_MASK_ALL & ~host->sdcard_irq_mask;
@@ -697,6 +697,8 @@ static void tmio_mmc_sdio_irq(int irq, v
 
 	if (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ && ireg & TMIO_SDIO_STAT_IOIRQ)
 		mmc_signal_sdio_irq(mmc);
+
+	return ireg;
 }
 
 irqreturn_t tmio_mmc_irq(int irq, void *devid)
@@ -718,9 +720,10 @@ irqreturn_t tmio_mmc_irq(int irq, void *
 	if (__tmio_mmc_sdcard_irq(host, ireg, status))
 		return IRQ_HANDLED;
 
-	tmio_mmc_sdio_irq(irq, devid);
+	if (tmio_mmc_sdio_irq(irq, devid))
+		return IRQ_HANDLED;
 
-	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+	return IRQ_NONE;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tmio_mmc_irq);