| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqN4s1CZa9z5C3YzCUO01V-=Xhtao5352Pmytd-Tusv9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:33:52 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Kishon <kishon@...com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mmc: sdhci: Get rid of finish_tasklet
+ Arnd, Grygorii
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 20:17, Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com> wrote:
>
> sdhci.c has two bottom halves implemented. A threaded_irq for handling
> card insert/remove operations and a tasklet for finishing mmc requests.
> With the addition of external dma support, dmaengine APIs need to
> terminate in non-atomic context before unmapping the dma buffers.
>
> To facilitate this, remove the finish_tasklet and move the call of
> sdhci_request_done() to the threaded_irq() callback. Also move the
> interrupt result variable to sdhci_host so it can be populated from
> anywhere inside the sdhci_irq handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
Adrian, I think it makes sense to apply this patch, even if there is
very minor negative impact throughput wise.
To me, it doesn't seems like MMC/SD/SDIO has good justification for
using tasklets, besides from the legacy point of view, of course.
Instead, I think we should try to move all mmc hosts into using
threaded IRQs.
So, what do you think? Can you overlook the throughput drop and
instead we can try to recover this on top with other optimizations?
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 43 +++++++++++++++-------------------------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index eba9bcc92ad3..20ed09b896d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static void __sdhci_finish_mrq(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>
> WARN_ON(i >= SDHCI_MAX_MRQS);
>
> - tasklet_schedule(&host->finish_tasklet);
> + host->result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> }
>
> static void sdhci_finish_mrq(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> @@ -2705,14 +2705,6 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static void sdhci_tasklet_finish(unsigned long param)
> -{
> - struct sdhci_host *host = (struct sdhci_host *)param;
> -
> - while (!sdhci_request_done(host))
> - ;
> -}
> -
> static void sdhci_timeout_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> {
> struct sdhci_host *host;
> @@ -2995,11 +2987,12 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
>
> static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> - irqreturn_t result = IRQ_NONE;
> struct sdhci_host *host = dev_id;
> u32 intmask, mask, unexpected = 0;
> int max_loops = 16;
>
> + host->result = IRQ_NONE;
> +
> spin_lock(&host->lock);
>
> if (host->runtime_suspended && !sdhci_sdio_irq_enabled(host)) {
> @@ -3009,7 +3002,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
> intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> if (!intmask || intmask == 0xffffffff) {
> - result = IRQ_NONE;
> + host->result = IRQ_NONE;
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -3054,7 +3047,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>
> host->thread_isr |= intmask & (SDHCI_INT_CARD_INSERT |
> SDHCI_INT_CARD_REMOVE);
> - result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> + host->result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> }
>
> if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_CMD_MASK)
> @@ -3074,7 +3067,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> (host->ier & SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT)) {
> sdhci_enable_sdio_irq_nolock(host, false);
> host->thread_isr |= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
> - result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> + host->result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> }
>
> intmask &= ~(SDHCI_INT_CARD_INSERT | SDHCI_INT_CARD_REMOVE |
> @@ -3087,8 +3080,8 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> sdhci_writel(host, intmask, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> }
> cont:
> - if (result == IRQ_NONE)
> - result = IRQ_HANDLED;
> + if (host->result == IRQ_NONE)
> + host->result = IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> } while (intmask && --max_loops);
> @@ -3101,7 +3094,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> sdhci_dumpregs(host);
> }
>
> - return result;
> + return host->result;
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t sdhci_thread_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> @@ -3131,6 +3124,12 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_thread_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> }
>
> + if (!isr) {
> + do {
> + isr = !sdhci_request_done(host);
> + } while (isr);
> + }
> +
> return isr ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> @@ -4212,12 +4211,6 @@ int __sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> int ret;
>
> - /*
> - * Init tasklets.
> - */
> - tasklet_init(&host->finish_tasklet,
> - sdhci_tasklet_finish, (unsigned long)host);
> -
> timer_setup(&host->timer, sdhci_timeout_timer, 0);
> timer_setup(&host->data_timer, sdhci_timeout_data_timer, 0);
>
> @@ -4230,7 +4223,7 @@ int __sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: Failed to request IRQ %d: %d\n",
> mmc_hostname(mmc), host->irq, ret);
> - goto untasklet;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> ret = sdhci_led_register(host);
> @@ -4263,8 +4256,6 @@ int __sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> sdhci_writel(host, 0, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
> sdhci_writel(host, 0, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
> free_irq(host->irq, host);
> -untasklet:
> - tasklet_kill(&host->finish_tasklet);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -4326,8 +4317,6 @@ void sdhci_remove_host(struct sdhci_host *host, int dead)
> del_timer_sync(&host->timer);
> del_timer_sync(&host->data_timer);
>
> - tasklet_kill(&host->finish_tasklet);
> -
> if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc))
> regulator_disable(mmc->supply.vqmmc);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index 6cc9a3c2ac66..624d5aa01995 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ struct sdhci_host {
>
> unsigned int desc_sz; /* ADMA descriptor size */
>
> - struct tasklet_struct finish_tasklet; /* Tasklet structures */
> + irqreturn_t result; /* Result of IRQ handler */
>
> struct timer_list timer; /* Timer for timeouts */
> struct timer_list data_timer; /* Timer for data timeouts */
> --
> 2.19.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists