[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13afa294-e279-9ba3-352d-184730f483d4@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:17:34 +0000
From: <Razvan.Stefanescu@...rochip.com>
To: <richard.genoud@...il.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<jslaby@...e.com>
CC: <webergil@...il.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty/serial: atmel: Add is_half_duplex helper
On 18/03/2019 15:41, Richard Genoud wrote:
> [ adding Gil Weber in Cc: ]
>
> Le 15/03/2019 à 10:23, Razvan Stefanescu a écrit :
>> Use a helper function to check that a port needs to use half duplex
>> communication, replacing several occurrences of multi-line bit checking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Razvan Stefanescu <razvan.stefanescu@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> index 05147fe24343..a6577b1c4461 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ static inline void atmel_uart_write_char(struct uart_port *port, u8 value)
>> __raw_writeb(value, port->membase + ATMEL_US_THR);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int atmel_uart_is_half_duplex(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> + return ((port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) &&
>> + !(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) ||
>> + (port->iso7816.flags & SER_ISO7816_ENABLED);
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL_PDC
>> static bool atmel_use_pdc_rx(struct uart_port *port)
>> {
>> @@ -608,10 +615,10 @@ static void atmel_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port)
>> /* Disable interrupts */
>> atmel_uart_writel(port, ATMEL_US_IDR, atmel_port->tx_done_mask);
>>
>> - if (((port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) &&
>> - !(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) ||
>> - port->iso7816.flags & SER_ISO7816_ENABLED)
>> - atmel_start_rx(port);
>> + if (atmel_uart_is_half_duplex(port))
>> + if (!atomic_read(&atmel_port->tasklet_shutdown))
> This check wasn't there before.
> If it's really needed, please insert it in another patch and explain why
> it's needed.
>
Thank you for the feedback. It is not needed, will be removed in v2.
Best regards,
Razvan
>> + atmel_start_rx(port);
>> +
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -628,9 +635,7 @@ static void atmel_start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
>> return;
>>
>> if (atmel_use_pdc_tx(port) || atmel_use_dma_tx(port))
>> - if (((port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) &&
>> - !(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) ||
>> - port->iso7816.flags & SER_ISO7816_ENABLED)
>> + if (atmel_uart_is_half_duplex(port))
>> atmel_stop_rx(port);
>>
>> if (atmel_use_pdc_tx(port))
>> @@ -928,9 +933,7 @@ static void atmel_complete_tx_dma(void *arg)
>> */
>> if (!uart_circ_empty(xmit))
>> atmel_tasklet_schedule(atmel_port, &atmel_port->tasklet_tx);
>> - else if (((port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) &&
>> - !(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) ||
>> - port->iso7816.flags & SER_ISO7816_ENABLED) {
>> + else if (atmel_uart_is_half_duplex(port)) {
>> /* DMA done, stop TX, start RX for RS485 */
>> atmel_start_rx(port);
>> }
>> @@ -1508,9 +1511,7 @@ static void atmel_tx_pdc(struct uart_port *port)
>> atmel_uart_writel(port, ATMEL_US_IER,
>> atmel_port->tx_done_mask);
>> } else {
>> - if (((port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) &&
>> - !(port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) ||
>> - port->iso7816.flags & SER_ISO7816_ENABLED) {
>> + if (atmel_uart_is_half_duplex(port)) {
>> /* DMA done, stop TX, start RX for RS485 */
>> atmel_start_rx(port);
>> }
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists