lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190318142916.GK8924@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:29:16 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Pankaj Suryawanshi <pankaj.suryawanshi@...fochips.com>
Cc:     "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: mm/cma.c: High latency for cma allocation

On Mon 18-03-19 14:02:09, Pankaj Suryawanshi wrote:
>> > I have the system(vanilla kernel) with 2GB of RAM, reserved 1GB for CMA. No swap or zram.
>> > Sorry, I don't have information where the time is spent.
>> > time is calculated in between cma_alloc call.
>> > I have just cma_alloc trace information/function graph.
> 
>> Then please collect that data because it is really hard to judge
>> anything from the numbers you have provided.
>
> Any pointers from which i can get this details ?

I would start by enabling built in tracepoints for the migration or use
a system wide perf monitoring with call graph data.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ