[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190318144115.GC27941@altlinux.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:41:15 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, jdike@...toit.com,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@....com>, Bin Lu <bin.lu@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ptrace: introduce ptrace_syscall_enter to
consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:49:21AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently each architecture handles PTRACE_SYSEMU in very similar way.
> It's completely arch independent and can be handled in the code helping
> to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling.
>
> Let's introduce a hook 'ptrace_syscall_enter' that arch specific syscall
> entry code can call.
Sorry if I'm late for the party, but the new name looks confusing.
If all it does is related to TIF_SYSCALL_EMU, why does it have a generic
name 'ptrace_syscall_enter' without any hint of being specific to
TIF_SYSCALL_EMU?
--
ldv
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists