linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: Allow booting kernel from any 4KB aligned address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1903180906560.25529@viisi.sifive.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
cc:     Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: Allow booting kernel from any 4KB aligned
 address

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019, Mike Rapoport wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 04:55:30AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> 
> > We started exploring ways to re-claim memory below kernel because
> > we are trying to get Linux working on Kendryte K210 board
> > (https://kendryte.com/). This board has dual-core 64bit RISC-V but it
> > only has 8MB RAM.
> 
> Huh, 8MB of RAM is tough...
> 
> It is possible to use the memory below the kernel, e.g x86-64 does that.
> But it is definitely a separate change and with such RAM diet using 4K
> pages seems unavoidable.
> 
> I still have concern about using 4K pages whenever the load address is not
> 2M (4M) aligned. People tend to not pay enough attention to such details
> and they would load the kernel at an arbitrary address and get the
> performance hit.
> 
> I think the default should remain as is and the ability to map the kernel
> with 4K pages (and use 4K aligned load address) should be a Kconfig option.

Agreed.  That Kconfig parameter should also be default-off.
  
Only a small number of people will try to run RISC-V Linux on a Kendryte 
board.  That niche use-case shouldn't impact the much larger group of 
people who will run Linux on more reasonably-sized systems.  No one should 
need to ask people to report their kernel load address whenever someone
reports a performance regression.


- Paul