lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, fw@...len.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: xfrm: Add '_rcu' tag for rcu protected pointer in
 netns_xfrm



On 03/11/2019 03:10 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:54:08PM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
>> For rcu protected pointers, we'd better add '__rcu' for them.
>>
>> Once added '__rcu' tag for rcu protected pointer, the sparse tool reports
>> warnings.
>>
>> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1198:39: sparse:    expected struct sock *sk
>> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1198:39: sparse:    got struct sock [noderef] <asn:4> *nlsk
>> [...]
>>
>> So introduce a new wrapper function of nlmsg_unicast  to handle type
>> conversions.
>>
>> This patch also fixes a direct access of a rcu protected socket.
>>
>> Fixes: be33690d8fcf("[XFRM]: Fix aevent related crash")
>> Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> Patch applied, thanks!
> 

Has this patch ever been tested ?

I do not see the needed rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock() that are mandated for
rcu_dereference() correctness.

All changes like that should be tested with :

CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y

Powered by blists - more mailing lists