[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2c7685a-fb11-5b31-05f4-e3938efba08b@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:30:27 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Cc: pakki001@....edu, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extcon: fix a missing check of regmap_read
Hi,
On 18-03-19 17:41, Kangjie Lu wrote:
> When regmap_read fails, it doesn't make sense to use the read
> value "val" because it can be uninitialized.
>
> The fix returns if regmap_read fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> index a983708b77a6..b2ba5f073aa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static void axp288_extcon_log_rsi(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
> int ret;
>
> ret = regmap_read(info->regmap, AXP288_PS_BOOT_REASON_REG, &val);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_dbg(info->dev, "regmap_read error %d\n", ret);
> + return;
> + }
> for (i = 0, rsi = axp288_pwr_up_down_info; *rsi; rsi++, i++) {
> if (val & BIT(i)) {
> dev_dbg(info->dev, "%s\n", *rsi);
Patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists