[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190318173256.012fca06@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:32:56 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: fusb302: Fix debugfs mutex initialisation
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:39:22 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:06:00PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Running a kernel with the fusb302 driver and lockdep enabled
> > leads to an unpleasant warning:
> >
> > [ 4.617477] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> > [ 4.617930] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> > [ 4.618418] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> > [ 4.618913] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc1-00007-g3542533f3fc9 #13
> > [ 4.619620] Hardware name: rockchip evb_rk3399/evb_rk3399, BIOS 2019.04-rc3-00124-g2feec69fb1 03/15/2019
> > [ 4.620454] Call trace:
> > [ 4.620693] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x138
> > [ 4.621028] show_stack+0x24/0x30
> > [ 4.621336] dump_stack+0xbc/0x104
> > [ 4.621649] register_lock_class+0x594/0x598
> > [ 4.622036] __lock_acquire+0x80/0x11b8
> > [ 4.622384] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x260
> > [ 4.622711] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x8a0
> > [ 4.623037] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x50
> > [ 4.623394] _fusb302_log+0x88/0x1f0
> > [ 4.623721] fusb302_log+0x7c/0xa0
> > [ 4.624033] tcpm_init+0x5c/0x190
> > [ 4.624336] tcpm_init+0x3c/0x130
> > [ 4.624640] tcpm_register_port+0x574/0x878
> > [ 4.625019] fusb302_probe+0x2c8/0x590
> >
> > Despite what the message says, the code isn't fine, as it tries to
> > make use of the fusb302_log facility pretty early. This requires the
> > logbuffer_lock mutex to be initialised, but that only happens much
> > later. Boo.
> >
> > Hoist the fusb302_debugfs_init call before tcpm_register_port so that
> > we can enjoy a working mutex.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
> > index e9344997329c..7e3f8901daf6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
> > @@ -1790,6 +1790,7 @@ static int fusb302_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > goto destroy_workqueue;
> > }
> >
> > + fusb302_debugfs_init(chip);
>
> This needs another error exit label right after destroy_workqueue,
> and an added call to fusb302_debugfs_exit() after that label.
You do mean before destroy_workqueue, right? Otherwise, the error
handling doesn't nest properly... Something like this:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
index 7e3f8901daf6..76cb8be6f3eb 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
@@ -1796,7 +1796,7 @@ static int fusb302_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
ret = PTR_ERR(chip->tcpm_port);
if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
dev_err(dev, "cannot register tcpm port, ret=%d", ret);
- goto destroy_workqueue;
+ goto unregister_debugfs;
}
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(chip->dev, chip->gpio_int_n_irq,
@@ -1814,6 +1814,8 @@ static int fusb302_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
tcpm_unregister_port:
tcpm_unregister_port(chip->tcpm_port);
+unregister_debugfs:
+ fusb302_debugfs_exit(chip);
destroy_workqueue:
destroy_workqueue(chip->wq);
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists