| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1552984243-7689-3-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:00:35 +0530
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@....com>,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/10] KVM: arm64: Support runtime sysreg visibility filtering
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Some optional features of the Arm architecture add new system
registers that are not present in the base architecture.
Where these features are optional for the guest, the visibility of
these registers may need to depend on some runtime configuration,
such as a flag passed to KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT.
For example, ZCR_EL1 and ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 need to be hidden if SVE
is not enabled for the guest, even though these registers may be
present in the hardware and visible to the host at EL2.
Adding special-case checks all over the place for individual
registers is going to get messy as the number of conditionally-
visible registers grows.
In order to help solve this problem, this patch adds a new sysreg
method restrictions() that can be used to hook in any needed
runtime visibility checks. This method can currently return
REG_NO_USER to inhibit enumeration and ioctl access to the register
for userspace, and REG_NO_GUEST to inhibit runtime access by the
guest using MSR/MRS.
This allows a conditionally modified view of individual system
registers such as the CPU ID registers, in addition to completely
hiding register where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index a5d14b5..75942f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1927,6 +1927,12 @@ static void perform_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{
trace_kvm_sys_access(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), params, r);
+ /* Check for regs disabled by runtime config */
+ if (restrictions(vcpu, r) & REG_NO_GUEST) {
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+ return;
+ }
+
/*
* Not having an accessor means that we have configured a trap
* that we don't know how to handle. This certainly qualifies
@@ -2438,6 +2444,10 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if (!r)
return get_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
+ /* Check for regs disabled by runtime config */
+ if (restrictions(vcpu, r) & REG_NO_USER)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
if (r->get_user)
return (r->get_user)(vcpu, r, reg, uaddr);
@@ -2459,6 +2469,10 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if (!r)
return set_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
+ /* Check for regs disabled by runtime config */
+ if (restrictions(vcpu, r) & REG_NO_USER)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
if (r->set_user)
return (r->set_user)(vcpu, r, reg, uaddr);
@@ -2515,7 +2529,8 @@ static bool copy_reg_to_user(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg, u64 __user **uind)
return true;
}
-static int walk_one_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
+static int walk_one_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
u64 __user **uind,
unsigned int *total)
{
@@ -2526,6 +2541,9 @@ static int walk_one_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
if (!(rd->reg || rd->get_user))
return 0;
+ if (restrictions(vcpu, rd) & REG_NO_USER)
+ return 0;
+
if (!copy_reg_to_user(rd, uind))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -2554,9 +2572,9 @@ static int walk_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uind)
int cmp = cmp_sys_reg(i1, i2);
/* target-specific overrides generic entry. */
if (cmp <= 0)
- err = walk_one_sys_reg(i1, &uind, &total);
+ err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, i1, &uind, &total);
else
- err = walk_one_sys_reg(i2, &uind, &total);
+ err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, i2, &uind, &total);
if (err)
return err;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index 3b1bc7f..b9dd4a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -64,8 +64,15 @@ struct sys_reg_desc {
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr);
int (*set_user)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr);
+
+ /* Return mask of REG_* runtime restriction flags */
+ unsigned int (*restrictions)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd);
};
+#define REG_NO_USER (1 << 0) /* hidden from userspace ioctl interface */
+#define REG_NO_GUEST (1 << 1) /* hidden from guest */
+
static inline void print_sys_reg_instr(const struct sys_reg_params *p)
{
/* Look, we even formatted it for you to paste into the table! */
@@ -102,6 +109,12 @@ static inline void reset_val(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r
__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = r->val;
}
+static inline unsigned int restrictions(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ return unlikely(r->restrictions) ? r->restrictions(vcpu, r) : 0;
+}
+
static inline int cmp_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *i1,
const struct sys_reg_desc *i2)
{
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists