[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190319084439.eya2pisiirattuil@kshutemo-mobl1>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:44:39 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Oliver <oohall@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/dax: Don't enable huge dax mapping by default
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 09:07:13AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:46 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V
> <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/6/19 5:14 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > On Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:47:33 +0530
> > > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:40 AM Oliver <oohall@...il.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:35 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
> > >>>> <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Also even if the user decided to not use THP, by
> > >> echo "never" > transparent_hugepage/enabled , we should continue to map
> > >> dax fault using huge page on platforms that can support huge pages.
> > >
> > > Is this a good idea?
> > >
> > > This knob is there for a reason. In some situations having huge pages
> > > can severely impact performance of the system (due to host-guest
> > > interaction or whatever) and the ability to really turn off all THP
> > > would be important in those cases, right?
> > >
> >
> > My understanding was that is not true for dax pages? These are not
> > regular memory that got allocated. They are allocated out of /dev/dax/
> > or /dev/pmem*. Do we have a reason not to use hugepages for mapping
> > pages in that case?
>
> The problem with the transparent_hugepage/enabled interface is that it
> conflates performing compaction work to produce THP-pages with the
> ability to map huge pages at all.
That's not [entirely] true. transparent_hugepage/defrag gates heavy-duty
compaction. We do only very limited compaction if it's not advised by
transparent_hugepage/defrag.
I believe DAX has to respect transparent_hugepage/enabled. Or not
advertise its huge pages as THP. It's confusing for user.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists