[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201903190907.mIc3klXH%lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:46:33 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Han Xu <han.xu@....com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [spi:for-5.2 11/19] drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c:483:5: sparse:
symbol 'fsl_lpspi_runtime_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-5.2
head: 69b921acae8a5b7feef03921d9b42c3634f3b9d1
commit: 944c01a889d97dc08e1b71f4ed868f4023fd6034 [11/19] spi: lpspi: enable runtime pm for lpspi
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 944c01a889d97dc08e1b71f4ed868f4023fd6034
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c:483:5: sparse: symbol 'fsl_lpspi_runtime_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c:501:5: sparse: symbol 'fsl_lpspi_runtime_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists