[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190319131345.5A46311288DF@debutante.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:13:45 +0000 (GMT)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: fix error path for regulator_set_voltage_unlocked" to the regulator tree
The patch
regulator: core: fix error path for regulator_set_voltage_unlocked
has been applied to the regulator tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 70b464918e5331e488058870fcc6821d54c4e541 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:17:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: fix error path for
regulator_set_voltage_unlocked
During several error paths in the function
regulator_set_voltage_unlocked() the value of 'ret' can take on negative
error values. However, in calls that go through the 'goto out' statement,
this return value is lost and return 0 is used instead, indicating a
'pass'.
There are several cases where this function should legitimately return a
fail instead of a pass: one such case includes constraints check during
voltage selection in the call to regulator_check_voltage(), which can
have -EINVAL for the case when an unsupported voltage is incorrectly
requested. In that case, -22 is expected as the return value, not 0.
Fixes: 9243a195be7a ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 68473d0cc57e..968dcd9d7a07 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3322,15 +3322,12 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(struct regulator *regulator,
/* for not coupled regulators this will just set the voltage */
ret = regulator_balance_voltage(rdev, state);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out2;
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ voltage->min_uV = old_min_uV;
+ voltage->max_uV = old_max_uV;
+ }
out:
- return 0;
-out2:
- voltage->min_uV = old_min_uV;
- voltage->max_uV = old_max_uV;
-
return ret;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists