[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190319131453.GG5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:14:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jolsa@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] perf/x86/intel: Extract memory code PEBS parser
for reuse
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 02:41:24PM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> @@ -1125,34 +1125,50 @@ static int intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline u64 intel_hsw_weight(struct pebs_record_skl *pebs)
> +static inline u64 intel_hsw_weight(u64 tsx_tuning)
That function name is now completely insane. It used to be a reference
to the hsw pebs format, but you just destroyed that.
> {
> - if (pebs->tsx_tuning) {
> - union hsw_tsx_tuning tsx = { .value = pebs->tsx_tuning };
> + if (tsx_tuning) {
> + union hsw_tsx_tuning tsx = { .value = tsx_tuning };
> return tsx.cycles_last_block;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline u64 intel_hsw_transaction(struct pebs_record_skl *pebs)
> +static u64 intel_hsw_transaction(u64 tsx_tuning, u64 ax)
Guess what...
> {
> - u64 txn = (pebs->tsx_tuning & PEBS_HSW_TSX_FLAGS) >> 32;
> + u64 txn = (tsx_tuning & PEBS_HSW_TSX_FLAGS) >> 32;
>
> /* For RTM XABORTs also log the abort code from AX */
> - if ((txn & PERF_TXN_TRANSACTION) && (pebs->ax & 1))
> - txn |= ((pebs->ax >> 24) & 0xff) << PERF_TXN_ABORT_SHIFT;
> + if ((txn & PERF_TXN_TRANSACTION) && (ax & 1))
> + txn |= ((ax >> 24) & 0xff) << PERF_TXN_ABORT_SHIFT;
> return txn;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists