linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/22] perf/x86: Support constraint ranges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190319160914.GL5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:09:14 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jolsa@...nel.org,
        eranian@...gle.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] perf/x86: Support constraint ranges

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 08:57:57AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >  struct amd_nb {
> > >  	int nb_id;  /* NorthBridge id */
> > 
> > That's all the code, how does that add up to 2k ?
> 
> Because the tables are bigger. There are much more tables than code.

Tables is data, not text.